10/29/2004

MAKE UP YOUR MIND!!

This is a personal message from me to all you “undecided” people.

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU WAITING FOR?
MAKE UP YOUR MIND!!


This electioneering has been going on seriously for months now. What more do you need? Do you plan to go into the booth and make up your mind then?
What’s in there that you don’t know now?

They say this election is so close that you “undecided people” will determine who our next president will be. So, please make up your mind.

You’re scaring me.

Please, at least think about it.

Interesting fact: When I typed my question,
“WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU WAITING FOR?”
in MS Word the spelling checker made a suggestion that I should say,
“WHAT THE HELL IS YOU WAITING FOR?”
Maybe that’s the answer.

This is The Old Professor and I approve this message.

10/28/2004

WHAT A DAY IT HAS BEEN!!

This has been one spooky time and I’m not really sure what it all means.

Last night there was a lunar eclipse. I guess this is a big deal in some circles but it got a big yawn around here.

I was interested to read one columnist in the local paper who pointed out one of the values of observing this eclipse was that it by observing the earth’s shadow there was proof positive that the world was round. Thank God that turns out to be a fact.

Then during this breathtaking event the Boston Red Sox won the World Series of Baseball for the first time in 86 years.

Thank God for that too. I was beginning to get a little bit impatient after the 1946 debacle against these very same St. Louis Cardinals. That was the series where my hero, Ted Williams, arguably the best hitter of all time, only managed to bat .200 and the Red Sox lost in 7 games.

Then this morning, I looked to the east and just as I have always predicted would happen if the Red Sox ever won a World Series, I saw these three Wise Guys, riding on camels and bearing gifts of frankincense and
myrrh.

I have no idea why they chose those particular gifts except I suppose the variety of gift selections are fairly sparse in the camel-riding part of the world these days.

By the way, my prediction 'that they would come from the East' wasn’t exactly brilliant. To the West is all ocean and camels are not known for their swimming abilities.

Anyway, they wanted to get a peek at the miracle baby to see what all the fuss was about.

They took one look and left. One of the Wise Guys wanted his myrrh back but the other two talked him out of it.

It was quite a memorable day.

10/25/2004

CHINESE ZODIAC

The Chinese culture and many traditions date way back to before the Boston Red Sox won their last World Series. Even before that.
My domestic partner, Jen-Chi, has explained much of this to me but I was surprised when I learned about the Chinese Zodiac.

When I started these blogs and created a profile I was told I was “Born in the year of the boar.”
I had no idea what that meant so I asked and learned a little.
It appears the Chinese celebrate years and name them for animals. They occur in repeating 12-year cycles based on a lunar calendar. Those years start at the Chinese New Year, and this year (2004), the Chinese New Year was either January 21 or January 22 depending upon what time zone you happen to be in at that time.
People born in certain years have certain characteristics. I wanted to know that kind of a person was “Born in the year of the boar”. I found out that person is:

Honest, chivalrous, gallant, with tremendous fortitude, the Boar person is affectionate and kind to loved ones, has a great thirst for knowledge. Boar year people mate well with Rabbit and Ram year people.

I don’t know about that mating with rabbits and rams stuff; I've never tried that. But other than that, isn’t it remarkable that the rest of it is so accurate? Anyone reading that description would know right away that I was the one being described. Remarkable people, these Chinese.

10/24/2004

IRONY

I don’t know why, but every once in awhile a word pops into my mind and I feel I must “look it up” even though I think I know what it means.
Today the word was “ironic”.
I think maybe it applies to my life.
Allow me to explain a little.
I’ve always been fond of using tools.
In high school I took shop courses at a Technical High School.
Then I worked as a tool and die maker.
Then I went on to teach thousands of students to use tools.
I even built a boat. Well, most of a boat.

Then two things happened:
I broke my shoulder and it never healed properly.
On top of that, I got older, but I suspect that didn’t have anything to do with the shoulder.
I had planned on getting older anyway.

But now things are different.
I can pick up a hammer but no longer can hammer.
I can pick up a saw but no longer can saw.
I can pick up a plane but no longer can plane.
I can pickup a screwdriver but no longer can use that either.
Well, at least not very well.

Now that’s ironic.

It’s “3. Poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended.”

Now I have to look up poignantly”.

poign·ant (poin'yÉ™nt) adj.

1 a. Physically painful: “Keen, poignant agonies seemed to shoot from his neck downward” (Ambrose Bierce).
b. Keenly distressing to the mind or feelings: poignant anxiety. Profoundly moving; touching: a poignant memory. See synonyms at moving.

Yah, that’s it all right, “1b. Keenly distressing to the mind or feelings.”

Or both.

10/23/2004

A BEAUTIFUL SUNRISE

While walking early this morning I saw one of the most beautiful sunrises I’ve ever seen. The sky was baby-blue, streaked with a few pure white jet trails. Also featured were a few rows of lamb’s wool clouds that were tinted with enough pink to almost be red. I wished I had brought my camera.

It made me think of The Bible where it says, “God hath created beauty to celebrate and rejoice in all things wondrous”(John: 9:15)

I wondered what “wondrous” thing was about to happen. Then I remembered an old poem I'd heard many years ago:
Red sky in the morning,
St. Louis take warning.
Red sky at night,
Cardinals' delight.

Tonight the world series opens!

Go Red Sox!!

GO RED SOX

Todaythe 2004 Word Series of baseball begins with the New York Yankees playing the Boston Red Sox at Boston.

My daughter, Meggiecat, writes me that she would love to root for the Boston to win the series but she has a dilemma because she has always heard me say, “When Boston wins a World Series it will be the end of the world.”

Oh well, we all have to go sometime.

Go Red Sox!


10/21/2004

PROCRASTINATION

I was doing something that almost always proves disastrous, I was thinking. This time I got wondering about a word. The word is crastination.

Apparently people are divided into two camps on this word. You are either for crastination or you are against it.

The anticrastinators point to the efficiency of their method by claiming that with people opposed to crastination in charge, things get done.

The people who support crastrination point to the sorry state of affairs in the world today and blame it entirely on the anticrastinators.

I suppose both sides have valid arguments but for myself, I support procrastination and have had remarkable success following the basic principles of procrastination. There are many, many of these principles but I have only read a few. I’ll probably read the rest soon.

To just give one example of the positive side of the Procrastination Movement, if we had a procrastinator in the White House today, there would be no war. At least not yet. Maybe tomorrow, but not right now.

At the last meeting, our banner hung proudly above the speaker’s platform for all to see our motto: “There’s No ‘I’ In Procrastination”.

After the sign was made someone noticed there really was an “I” in procrastination and a committee was formed to look into fixing that. Someday. That was eight years ago. The motto has been officially changed but the banner will be printed soon. Maybe tomorrow. The new motto is, “ A Procrastinators Best Friend is a Committee”.

Please click here.

10/18/2004

SURVIVING ENGLISH LIT

While I was attending college I somehow, managed to convince some people that I had a great depth of knowledge in the field of English Literature. Nothing could be further from fact. I didn’t then and today I still don’t, understand the imagery and references in most poems of early England. However, I did learn there are people who contend they do – many, many people. A great number of these people have written books to demonstrate to others that they do know. These books are in abundance in most libraries and my college had many. Hence, with some reading it was possible for me to appear to have knowledge that, in reality, I did not have.

My very first challenge was when the assignment called for the reading of The Rime of the Ancient Mariner written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge around 1800.

Now to begin with, the word “rime” meant, “rhyme” back in those days. Like in "Mary Had a Little Lamb". I didn’t know that but they people who wrote those books knew that.

It starts out with:

It is an ancient Mariner
And he stoppeth one of three.
'By thy long beard and glittering eye
Now wherefore stopp'st thou me?

Now as any fool can see, this says there’s these three guys and this old sailor stops one and that guy says, “Wadda ya stopping me for?”

So in each class I would just repeat what I had read in these books even though it still didn’t make any sense to me. It seemed to work.

Then one day our assignment was to read a particular poem by Robert Browning called “How They Brought the Good News from Ghent to Aix”.

According to what I read, Ghent was place in Belgium where some kind of conflict had taken place. Three guys had jumped on their horses to attempt to ride all the way to Aix, which is in France, to carry the news there had been a victory. It was a long trip and only one horse made it and even he died in the town square. The rider gave his horse a sip of his wine but it didn’t help. The horse died.

The critics I read seemed to think this was as simple poem about horses that Browning had written just for the fun of it. So, that’s what I thought too. But it wasn’t that simple.

At lunch, just before the English Lit class, I sat at a table with other class members. They happened to all be girls in the 19-year old range. One blonde girl is memorable because she said everything twice. No one knew why.
As I got to the table she said, “You’re good at this. You’re good at this.
Did you read the poem? Did you read the poem?”
I said I had read the poem and didn’t mention the library work. I never did.
“What did it mean? What did it mean?”
For some reason I really can’t explain, I gave a playful answer. I told her, (well, actually I told all of them) “I saw this as a poem about man, racing though life searching for God and then, the wine at the end, that was his attaining it.”
“Oh, thank you. Oh, thank you.”

We went to class and there was a quiz. We were asked to write our opinion of that poem. I wrote something that started with, “Having been brought up on a farm, I know how devoted a horse can become to his master.” Of course, I wasn’t raised on a farm. I only knew what a farm looked like from pictures.

I thought nothing more about it until the next class when our professor told us the test results.

She said, “I know I’ve told you that whatever you read into a poem is what it is, but in this case so many of you thought the horse represented man, racing towards his immortal goal. I didn’t see it that way at all.”
Then, actually using my name, she said that she tended to think along the same lines as I did and it was simple story about a horse. She felt it was nothing more than that.

From behind I heard a soft voice say, “You son-of-a-bitch. You son-of-a-bitch.”

10/17/2004

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE, HARRY TRUMAN?

Yesterday, October 16, 2004 the New York Yankees beat the Boston Red Sox -- again. For a long-suffering Red Sox fan and confirmed Yankee hater, I felt this was humiliating as the score was 19 for the New Yorks and only 8 for the Bostons.

I lay part of the blame for this directly on Harry Truman. You recall that he was the President who decided to drop the first atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He could just as well have gone a few miles north and wiped out Kanazawa. If this had happened the radiation would probably have left the whole Matsui family sterile and Yankee oufielder, Hideki Matsui, would never have been born and obviously would not have hit two homeruns to help destroy the Red Sox last night.


Losing a game that way may have put the Red Sox away forever and their fans probably can never again look forward to the day they might, just might, possibly beat The Yankees.

And it's all your fault, Harry Truman.

10/16/2004

WHO DECIDES PRONUNCIATIONS?

I realize this subject might sound trivial and not have the scholarly depth of my previous blogs but I think it needs investigation.

Who decides how acronyms are pronounced?

I heard a different one on the radio this morning and it started me wondering if there are rules and, if so who makes them?

Take a simple acronym such as NASA, like the space people. Using my own non-standard phonetic symbols, I think most people say like NAH-SUH or maybe some say NAH-SAW. Maybe some Bostonians might even say NAH-SER.

However, if we look at what NASA is an acronym for we find it’s the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. So, to pronounce NASA we would start with the “NA” as in “National”, and hence the “NAH” seems about right for the first part. But what about the SA? Wouldn’t the ‘A’ be from Administration and pronounced like beginning of “Administration” or sort of like “AH”. So you end up with the “AH” and the “AH” giving you NAHSAH.

That even confuses me, so let’s try this. Say out loud, “National” and then again but only the first syllable – the “NA” part. Now say “administration” and say it again dropping all but the “AD”. Throw in the “S” now and you have NA-S-AD. Now drop the ‘D’.
You now are pronouncing it one way and even though it seems logical, I have never heard it that way. I wonder why.

So, as I said, what actually got me thinking about this was a pronunciation I heard on the radio. A woman said, “For further information go to http://www.xyx.org/.” [Don’t click on that: it’s a dummy address] Now, the way she pronounced the “org” was as it would be in “George” or “orgy”, where as I've always thought it was like the “org” in “organization.”

Maybe her web site is an orgy web site. I’ll have to check it out.

All this has given me cephalalgia. Or as NINDS (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) defines it, “a headache”. I think that’s pronounced “nin-duz” but it could be “n-eye-dis”. Whatever it is, they suggest I go someplace quiet and lie down. Actually, they said, “lay” down but according to NAEP, that’s pronounced – Oh, the hell with it, I’m going to do it.